Perilous Adventures
spacer
line decor
line decor
spacer

Pandora

sponsored by:

Olvar Wood Writers Retreat

 

 
 

On Reviewing

by Carla Billinghurst
 

Choosing A Book is as easy as choosing a loverWhy bother to write reviews at all? Isn't it just a  matter of walking into the library or bookstore or logging on to Amazon and checking out the “People who bought this, also bought...” lists? Why do we need to read what someone thinks about a book?

Well...where do I start?

Recently, Paul in the video shop said to me “What do you like?” and I said, “Oh, you know, things blow up with jokes and aliens; and some romance but not too much snogging.” He said, “Have you seen District 9?” I said “Duh!”

What I actually took home was a Swedish movie about two gay guys adopting a teenager and the story of the first time a Californian chardonnay beat a French one in a blind taste trial. Paul said “Huh?” and I said, “Look - the French and the Swedish are alien to me, things blow up emotionally, they're both funny and there's a bit of romance going on.” And he said, “How does that help me when I want to recommend things for you?” And I said, “I don't want you to recommend things for me.”

Curiosity
Which started me thinking about the reviews we'd like you to write for Perilous Adventures.  I go to the video shop or the book shop or a restaurant to make a choice; what do I feel like today? Reading reviews is kind of like being in that blind taste trial – we're offering you something we think you're going to like just as much as you like the books you are used to reading, regardless of the label.  If I decide Pushkin is going to be hard to read but then someone says “No, Pushkin's great fun!” I might just head to the library and find out. I would hope that our reviews might arouse your curiosity; because part of the job of a Reviewer is to help you extend your taste.

A Love of What is Worthwhile
Then again, Damon Young (Distraction: a Philosopher's Guide to Being Free) says reviews are about communicating a love of what is worthwhile. 

The reviews published here are by writers for writers.  So this is not going to be like a newspaper reviewing books for a broad readership.  Does this book teach me about writing or demonstrate some Immortal Writing Truth?  My background is in theatre, so what I enjoy in the written word often has to do with the sound of the words spoken aloud.  What is worthwhile in theatre are words that sound good whilst conveying meaning.  But for something to sound good, the audience has to be able to hear it.  I once stood on the playing space of the ancient outdoor theatre at Epidavros and whispered to my sister who was sitting up in the back row, where two thousand years worth of bottoms have sat and, of course, she could hear me. Try doing that in your local theatre without a microphone!  So I can read Plautus or Terence and imagine one of those acoustically perfect performances.  What that does is help me to read a script with an understanding of the thousands of years of thinking and effort and design sitting behind the perfect line, the perfect image, the perfect expression of what it means to be this character in this situation.

And that gives some context, too – why would anyone read Plautus' Miles Gloriosus? Because it became that great film A Funny Thing Happened to Me on the Way to the Forum and because it was an early foray into writing that mocks self-importance, especially amongst soldiers.  And because when you read a few of those works and realise that there is a consistent expression of these ideas and attitudes across time, then you start to find a richer sense of your own place in the human world. 

Worthwhile Words
Charles DickensYears before I discovered that Dickens had written all of his books to be read aloud in music-hall performances, I was home-schooling my son and we decided to read Great Expectations together.  The difference between the written word and the words read aloud was extraordinary: suddenly the text came to life, and an English lesson that we were concerned would be a chore became a daily delight. We discovered Dickens could have been sitting next to us, telling us what he thought about men and women and love and hate. After that we read Orwell, Shakespeare and Virgil. I don't know that my son would voluntarily read Dickens today, but I know he feels connected back through time to thoughtful people and I know he will experiment, he will take the time to try and read something new and that he will know why it is new, what is new about it.  I'm not sure whether that explains him reading the whole of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies in one sitting but, hey, someone had to.

Outside Your Comfort Zone
Which brings us to reading outside your comfort zone.  I managed a couple of chapters of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and found I was noticing the precision of Austen's writing more because it stood out against the zombie-action – it's easy to write a parody of Austen, but her range and complexity of expression is not easy.  I suspect Austen would have thoroughly enjoyed the experiment and would have used it to show how much our society hides behind extremes of behaviour, or she might have used it to explore whether or not we are zombies in our day-to-day lives.  It could be a fun discussion.

Reading outside your comfort zone doesn't necessarily mean reading a new book or a new author -  it could mean bringing a new perception to an old favourite.  That's an old theatre trick, too – put on a version of Henry V with everyone in Nazi uniforms or set Hamlet in an insane asylum.  

Reading is a little less flamboyant, but when I first read Lord of the Rings I didn't know that Tolkien had written all through WWII; re-reading it later with that knowledge, I had a different understanding of his despair and the endless trials he put his characters through. Reading To The Lighthouse with an understanding of how Woolf constructs and layers meaning by having a character's thoughts run for three pages in between the tiny steps of darning a hole in a jumper, means you read with more of an appreciation of what the author is doing.  It might not be such a 'comfortable' read but it lets you learn from the great writers.

Engaging with Writing
Which brings us to how we all engage with writing.  Should we re-write the classics and are there any rules?  How much interaction is good?  If I publish a story online that has hyperlinks to alternate scenes and endings, is that good literature? 

For the last couple of years I have been writing a fairy tale.  For a long time I resisted and resisted reading any of the “authorities”, the collectors like Grimm, the early parlour fairytale writers like Perrault, great intellects like Bettelheim who studied fairy tales and Campbell who studied myths, modern scholars like Zipes and Warner, the great fairy tale re-writers like Angela Carter, but then I gave in.  I don't know precisely what I had been frightened of – perhaps that I would become part of an existing body of thought and therefore find my options narrowed, losing sight of the interesting things I wanted to write. Perhaps I was worried that I would discover it had all been written already and there was nothing left for me to say.  What I actually found was evidence of a huge and learned audience of people wanting to read this type of fantasy and an enduring tradition that has informed and stretched my writing without limiting it.

Reading New Things
We encourage children to eat new foods by making choo-choo noises.  Why bother? Why not let them live their lives on mashed potato and peanut butter sandwiches?  There needs to be some variation in food to meet health needs but otherwise, we can survive on a few basics – I remember being horrified at the age of seven when I watched the Queen giving a medal to a centenarian who insisted his longevity should be attributed to his diet of Guinness and Baked Beans.  I decided if I could only have Guinness and Beans I would rather die. 

A richer experience of food or art is not a necessity; we can do without it.  But how beige our lives would be if we didn't want more.  So while our reviews may not offer choo-choo noises, they will hopefully encourage a curiosity about what is out there beyond Guinness and Beans. 

What we would like a review to offer you
First of all, we're not going to tell you what happens ... no spoilers, no plot summaries so you know who dunnit.  We're not going to tell you what to read, although we might say readitreaditreadit! We're not going to defend anything – just because I think it's great writing and I can justify my opinion doesn't mean it's anything more than an opinion. What we will do is try to explain what we as writers love about a particular book.  Most of all, we intend to provide food for thought – Yum!

So You Want to be a Reviewer?

Critiquing and reviewing are great practice for writers.  I joined Critters for a while and found myself reading stories I hated without any idea how to express why I hated them.  Why did a story leave me cold?  Why did a plot-line leave me yawning?  What, exactly, was so irritating about a particular style of sentence construction? Like most writers who start critiquing other writer's work, I had to learn fast how to respond to other writers works in progress.

Reviewing and critiquing are quite similar skills, so most writers these days probably have the nuts and bolts skills of how to read someone else's work and provide some critical feedback. But reviews are different. Critiques presume a work is under construction; when you're reviewing, the work is finished, edited, and published. Critiquing can be a relatively private affair; reviewing is public. Critiquing is a dialogue between you and the author; reviewing is more of a one-way street.

At Perilous, we'd like to publish reviews from a broad range of perspectives. So, we'd welcome your reviews, but we do have some ideas about what those reviews should do:

  • Be prepared to give some context: who is the author?  Why, when and where are they writing?  Is there a body of work or a genre this book fits into and if so is it taking that body of work in a new direction?
  • Summarise the plot without giving away the goods – bad reviews re-tell the best jokes and give away the plot twists; good reviews engage your curiosity about plot and let you know that there are jokes and whether they are 'wry smile' or 'laugh out loud' and what effect that has in terms of the whole book.
  • Pull out the main themes, again without spoiling anything, and talk about how those themes are important in the world today.  And be able to make comparisons with other writers who have dealt with these or similar themes.
  • Write knowledgeably about writing.  This doesn't mean you should be able to define 'mimesis' or 'ecthesis' off the top of your head BUT it does mean you will have read broadly enough to say “it's like Kerouac...” or  “it reminds me of Winton...” and be able to talk about Structure and Voice and why you reacted to it, not just how..
  • Give an opinion that is measured and judicious.  These reviews are not about pillorying a writer – we are all writers and we all have worth!  Simply, it is a matter of saying “I liked aspect X but aspect Y...hmmm...”.

***

About the Author

Carla Billinghurst is the reviews editor for Perilous Adventures. If you'd like to submit a review, or contact her about writing book reviews for Perilous, email reviews@perilousadventures.net

Carla lives and writes in the Blue Mountains where she tries not to think too hard about the Ninth Legion.  She is currently working on a novel, The Dragon's Restaurant, which spills the beans on everything you always suspected (and more) about Sleeping Beauties and Bad Faery Godmothers.

*

issue 10:01 | archives by category | archives by author